Comparison of Three Calculation Methods for a Bayesian Inference of P(ϕ1 > ϕ2)
نویسندگان
چکیده
In Bayesian inference, some researchers have examined the difference of binominal proportions using () 1 2 0 1 2 P | , X X θ π π = > − ∆ , where i X denote binomial random variable with parameter i π. An approximate method and the MCMC method are compared with an exact method for θ , and results of actual clinical trials using θ are presented.
منابع مشابه
Fermat, Schubert, Einstein, and Behrens-Fisher: The Probable Difference Between Two Means When Ï...12⛀ Ï...22
The history of the Behrens-Fisher problem and some approximate solutions are reviewed. In outlining relevant statistical hypotheses on the probable difference between two means, the importance of the Behrens-Fisher problem from a theoretical perspective is acknowledged, but it is concluded that this problem is irrelevant for applied research in psychology, education, and related disciplines. Th...
متن کاملComparison of Three Calculation Methods for a Bayesian Inference of P(π1 > π2)
In Bayesian inference, some researchers have examined the difference of binominal proportions using () 1 2 0 1 2 P | , X X θ π π = > − ∆ , where i X denote binomial random variable with parameter i π. An approximate method and the MCMC method are compared with an exact method for θ , and results of actual clinical trials using θ are presented.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014